An Analysis of Transitivity in Analytical Exposition Texts Written by Eleventh Grade Students

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46870/lets.v5i1.688

Authors

Yulia Nur Septianti Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Eri Kurniawan Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Keywords:

analytical exposition text

pedagogical implications

transitivity system

Abstract

While studies on ideational metafunctions have been widely reported, research on transitivity analysis on students’ analytical exposition texts in EFL contexts is under-explored. The aims of this study are twofold: scrutinizing the process types and investigating the most dominant process in analytical exposition text as guided by Systemic Functional Linguistics theory. This study applied descriptive qualitative design focusing on experiential metafunction, comprising the processes of material, mental, verbal, relational, behavioral, and existential. The results show that among the six processes, the material process had the highest frequency of occurrence (45.6%), followed by the processes of relational (43.6%), mental (6.8%), verbal (1.94%), and finally, existential (1.94%). To conclude, the linguistic features of analytical exposition text, which is mental processes, are not accurately employed in the texts. The pedagogical implications of this study are: 1) encouraging students to study analytical exposition text and 2) helping students to think critically. Based on the findings, we suggest that the teacher is required to teach the text explicitly. In this context, explicit teaching can be done using a genre-based approach. Therefore, the students can comprehend the analytical exposition text as a whole.

References

Bloor, T. & Bloor, M. (1995). The functional analysis of English. A Hallidayan approach. London: Arnold.

Butt, D., Fahey, R., Feez, S., Spinks, S., Yallop, C. (2000). Using Functional Grammar. An Explorer’s Guide 2nd Ed. Sydney: National Centre for English Teaching and Research. Macquarie University.

Cope, B. & Kalantzis, M. (1993). A Genre Approach to Teaching Writing. London: Routledge.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (5th ed.). SAGE.

Coffin, C., Curry, M. J., Goodman, S., Hewings, A., Lillis, T., & Swann, J. (2005). Teaching academic writing: A toolkit for higher education. Routledge.

Derewianka, B. (1990). Exploring how texts work. Newtown: PETA.

Derewianka, B. (2011). A new grammar companion for primary teachers. Newton: PETA.

Derewianka, B. & Jones, P. (2016). Teaching Language in Context 2nd ed. University of Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Droga, L. & Humphrey, S. (2003). Grammar and meaning. An introduction for primary teachers. Berry, NSW: Target Texts.

Eggins, S. (1994). An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Printer Publishers, Ltd.

Eggins, S. (2004). An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Printer Publishers, Ltd.

Emilia, E. (2005). A critical genre-based approach to teaching academic writing in a tertiary EFL context in Indonesia. Volume 1. A PhD thesis submitted to the Department of Language, Literacy and Arts Education, Faculty of Education, The University of Melbourne.

Emilia, E. (2011). Pendekatan Berbasis Teks dalam Pengajaran Bahasa Inggris: Petunjuk Guru. Bandung: Kiblat Press.

Emilia, E. (2014). Introducing Functional Grammar . Bandung: Pustaka Jaya.

Emilia, E., Moecharam, N. Y., & Syifa, I. L. (2017). GENDER IN EFL CLASSROOM: TRANSITIVITY ANALYSIS IN ENGLISH TEXTBOOK FOR INDONESIAN STUDENTS. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 206. http://dx.doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i1.6877

Emilia, E., Habibi, N., & Bangga, L. A. (2018). An analysis of cohesion of exposition texts: An Indonesian context. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(3), 515-523. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i3.9791

Feez, S., & Joyce, H. (1998). Text-based Syllabus Design. Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research, Macquarie University.

Gerot, L. & Wignell, P. (1994). Making sense of functional grammar. Cammeray: Gerd Stabler.

Gibbons, P. (2009). English learners, academic literacy, and thinking. Portsmouth: Heinemann.

Guswita, K. A. (2020). Transitivity analysis of Jokowi and Prabowo campaign speech in Indonesian presidential election. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 5(1), 143-158.

Halliday, M.A.K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M.A.K., & Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (2004). Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. (3rd Edition). Routledge: New York.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. (2014). Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th ed.). Oxon: Routledge.

Halpern, D. F. (2003). The “how” and “why” of critical thinking assessment. Critical thinking and reasoning, 331-354.

Harmer, J. (2007). The Practice of English Language Teaching. Fourth Edition. England: Pearson Education Limited.

Kardi, N. & Hidayat, R. T. A. (2019). A genre analysis of students’ writing hortatory exposition text at eleventh grade of senior high school. Wiralodra English Journal, 3(1), 295–301. https://doi.org/10.31943/wej.v3i1.25

Kencana, D. M. N. I., & Gemilang, A. V. (2022). Transitivity Analysis of Eleventh-Grade Students’ Explanation Texts at One of Vocational High Schools in Klaten. English Education, 10(3), 167-178. https://doi.org/10.20961/ee.v10i3.59643

Liani, A. E., Annidi, A., & Wirza, Y. (2021). Transitivity analysis of Kamala Harris’ 2020 presidential victory speech concerning covid-19. In Thirteenth Conference on Applied Linguistics (CONAPLIN 2020) (pp. 7-13). Atlantis Press.

Martin, J. R. (1985). Factual writing: Exploring and challenging social reality. Melbourne: Deakin University Press.

Martin, J. R. (1997). Analysing genre: Functional parameters. Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school, 3, 39.

Martin, J. R., (2010). ‘Bridging troubled waters: interdisciplinarity and what makes it stick.’ In D. Wise., R. Andrew and J. Hoffman. (Eds). The International Handbook of English, Language and Literacy Teaching. Routledge: Taylor & Francis.

Matthiessen, C. & Halliday, M. (2009). Systemic Functional Grammar: a first step into the theory. China: Higher Education Press.

Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.

Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia. (2022). Keputusan kepala badan standar, kurikulum, dan asesmen pendidikan, kementerian pendidikan, kebudayaan, riset, dan teknologi nomor 008/H/Kr/2022 tentang capaian pembelajaran pada pendidikan anak usia dini, jenjang pendidikan dasar, dan jenjang pendidikan menengah pada kurikulum merdeka [The policy of head of the agency for education standards, curriculum, and assessment, ministry of education, culture, research, and technology number 008/H/Kr/2022 about learning outcomes in early childhood education, basic education, and secondary education in kurikulum merdeka]. Jakarta. https://kurikulum.kemdikbud.go.id/wp-content/unduhan/CP_2022.pdf

Mulyanti, W., & Wati, S. (2022). Transitivity System in Narrative Texts for Junior High School. Jurnal Pendidikan Edutama, 9(1), 133-146. http://dx.doi.org/10.30734/jpe.v9i1.2252

Mustofa, M. I., & Kurniawan, E. (2023). Theme and thematic progression in a recount text by an advanced student. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 481-494. http://dx.doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v7i2.1382

Nurlatifah, L., & Yusuf, F. N. (2022). Students’ problems in writing analytical exposition text in EFL classroom context. English Review: Journal of English Education, 10(3), 801-810. http://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v10i3.6633.

Nurwanti, N. (2022). A TRANSITIVITY ANALYSIS ON THE THIRD SEMESTER ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT STUDENTS’ DESCRIPTIVE WRITING. SIBATIK JOURNAL: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan, 1(2), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.54443/sibatik.v1i2.11

Pramono, S. A. (2019). A systemic functional linguistics-based analysis of students’ problems in writing exposition text. In Eleventh Conference on Applied Linguistics (CONAPLIN 2018) (pp. 131-135). Atlantis Press.

Rohayati, D. (2017). Students' Critical Thinking in Writing an English Exposition Text (A Case Study in a Private University in West Java). In Ninth International Conference on Applied Linguistics (CONAPLIN 9) (pp. 228-232). Atlantis Press.

Suryadi, H., & Yulandari, E. S. (2022). The Influence of Using Genre Based Instruction (GBI) in Writing Skill Exposition Text in Students SMPN 3 Pringgarata. EDUKASIA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 3(3), 617-628.

Terry, D. R. (2007). Using the case study teaching method to promote college students' critical thinking skills. State University of New York at Buffalo.

Thompson, G. (2014). Introducing Functional Grammar (3rd edition). London: Routledge.

Thwaite, A. (1983). Sexism in Three Mills and Boon Romances. Unpublished thesis, Department of Linguistics, University of Sydney.

Xiang, Q. (2022). Transitivity analysis of Joe Biden’s inaugural address from the perspective of systemic functional grammar. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(1), 165-169.

Yolanda, F., & Zaim, M. (2021). Transitivity Analysis of Hortatory Exposition Written by Third Years Student of English Education Program at Universitas Negeri Padang. Journal of English Language Teaching, 10(1), 160-169. http://10.24036/jelt.v10i1.111518

Zhao, M., & Zhang, Y. (2017). A transitivity analysis of American President Donald J. Trump’s inaugural address. International Journal of Liberal Arts and Social Science, 5(5), 31-43.