Deep Learning–Oriented Speaking Instruction: The Role of Memory, Cognitive, and Compensation Strategies in EFL

Authors

  • Abd Halim Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Nur Mutmainnna Halim Universitas Negeri Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46870/lets.v7i2.2052

Keywords:

Compensation Strategies, Deep Learning Pedagogy, EFL Speaking, Memory Strategies, Cognitive Strategies

Abstract

This study examines memory, cognitive, and compensation strategies in deep learning–oriented English-speaking instruction within an EFL context. Grounded in Oxford’s direct language learning strategy framework and deep learning pedagogy, speaking is conceptualized as a cognitively and strategically regulated process. Memory strategies facilitate encoding and retrieval, cognitive strategies support the processing and organization of ideas, and compensation strategies enable learners to sustain communication under constraints. The study aims to analyze how these strategies are enacted and interact in learners’ speech production and to explain their contributions to fostering deeper, more reflective, and more autonomous speaking practices. Adopting a qualitative descriptive design, data were collected through classroom observations and semi-structured interviews involving 34 English Literature students at Universitas Negeri Makassar (UNM), cohort 2024, Class A. The findings indicate that memory strategies support lexical retrieval and fluency, cognitive strategies facilitate idea development and discourse organization, and compensation strategies help learners manage communicative pressure and maintain interactional flow. Importantly, the interaction among these strategies promotes deeper engagement in speaking tasks, reflecting key principles of deep learning. The study suggests that deep learning–oriented speaking instruction, aligned with Kurikulum Merdeka, should explicitly integrate strategy-based pedagogy to support reflective, autonomous, and meaningful oral communication. These findings contribute to EFL pedagogy by demonstrating how language learning strategies function collectively to support sustainable speaking development in higher education contexts.

References

Al-Faris, S., & Jasim, B. Y. (2021). Memory strategies and vocabulary learning strategies: Implications on teaching and learning vocabulary. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies, 3(10), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.32996/jhsss.2021.3.10.2

Andayanie, L. M., Adhantoro, M. S., Purnomo, E., & Kurniaji, G. T. (2025). Implementation of Deep Learning in Education: Towards Mindful, Meaningful, and Joyful Learning Experiences. Journal of Deep Learning, 47–56. https://doi.org/10.23917/jdl.v1i1.11157

Awang, S., Hassan, W., Abdullah, N., & Zawawi, M. Z. M. (2022). Use of fillers as a communication strategy in oral interactions. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(7), 1024–1037. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i7/14330

Azzahra, I. F., & Rahmadhani, R. (2025). Kurikulum Merdeka: Telaah Potensi dan Tantangan Implementatif dalam Mewujudkan Pendidikan Fleksibel di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Inovasi, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.59818/jpi.v5i6.2288

Behroozian, R., Ghafoori, N., & Ahangari, S. (2025). An explicit communication strategies instruction: Iranian EFL learners’ self-reported use of communication strategies. جستارهای زبانی, 14(1), 219-250.

Biggs, J., Tang, C., & Kennedy, G. (2022). Teaching for quality learning at university 5e. McGraw-hill education (UK).

Castleberry, A., & Nolen, A. (2018). Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds? Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 10(6), 807–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.019

Chou, M.-H. (2024). Communication strategies, difficulties, and speaking tasks in foreign language learning. Sage Open, 14(3), 21582440241266324. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241266324

Di Carlo, S. (2017). Understanding cognitive language learning strategies. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.2p.114

Halim, A. (2024). A study on how the Merdeka curriculum promotes multilingualism in Indonesian ELT classrooms. XLinguae, 17 (2), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2024.17.02.07

Karbalaei, A., & Negin Taji, T. (2014). Compensation Strategies: Tracking Movement in EFL Learners’ Speaking Skills. Gist Education and Learning Research Journal, 9, 88–102. https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.145

Kashefian-Naeeini, S., & Maarof, N. (2022). Iranian EFL and Malaysian ESL University Students’ Use of Language Learning Strategies. Vision: Journal for Language and Foreign Language Learning, 11(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.21580/vjv11i211836

Kelleher, J. D. (2019). Deep learning. MIT press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11171.001.0001

Khokhar, S., Pathan, H., Raheem, A., & Abbasi, A. M. (2020). Theory development in thematic analysis: Procedure and practice. Review of Applied Management and Social Sciences, 3(3), 423–433. https://doi.org/10.47067/ramss.v3i3.79

Lambert, V. A., & Lambert, C. E. (2012). Qualitative descriptive research: An acceptable design. Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research, 16(4), 255–256.

Levelt, W. J. M. (1999). Models of word production. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(6), 223–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01319-4

Mathew, A., Amudha, P., & Sivakumari, S. (2020). Deep learning techniques: an overview. International Conference on Advanced Machine Learning Technologies and Applications, 599–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3383-9_54

Mayer, R. E. (1996). Learning strategies for making sense out of expository text: The SOI model for guiding three cognitive processes in knowledge construction. Educational Psychology Review, 8(4), 357–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01463939

Nemati, A. (2009). Memory vocabulary learning strategies and long-term retention. International Journal of Vocational and Technical Education, 1(2), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.4314/marang.v20i1.56821

Oxford, R. L. (2016). Teaching and researching language learning strategies: Self-regulation in context. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315719146

Pawlak, M. (2018). Investigating the use of speaking strategies in the performance of two communicative tasks: The importance of communicative goal. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 269–291. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.2.5

Plonsky, L., & Kim, Y. (2016). Task-based learner production: A substantive and methodological review. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 73–97. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190516000015

Rasheed, U., & Zafar, J. M. (2023). Effect of metacognitive strategies on secondary school students to achieve sustainable learning skills. Academy of Education and Social Sciences Review, 3(4), 521–529. https://doi.org/10.48112/aessr.v3i4.601

Shakarami, A., Hajhashemi, K., & Caltabiano, N. (2017). Compensation still matters: language learning strategies in the third millennium ESL learners. Available at SSRN 3032963. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3032963

Teng, F. (2020). The role of metacognitive knowledge and regulation in mediating university EFL learners’ writing performance. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 14(5), 436–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2019.1615493

Wilawan, S. (2012). Fostering main idea comprehension among EFL learners through cognitive and metacognitive strategies. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(14), 46–54.

Zhang, J. (2023). Exploring undergraduate translation students’ perceptions towards machine translation: A qualitative questionnaire survey. Proceedings of Machine Translation Summit XIX, Vol. 2: Users Track, 1–10.

Zhang, W., & Wilson, A. (2023). From self-regulated learning to computer-delivered integrated speaking testing: Does monitoring always monitor? Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1028754. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1028754

Zhang, W., Zhang, D., & Zhang, L. J. (2021). Metacognitive instruction for sustainable learning: Learners’ perceptions of task difficulty and use of metacognitive strategies in completing integrated speaking tasks. Sustainability, 13(11), 6275. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116275

Zhang, W., Zhao, M., & Zhu, Y. (2022). Understanding individual differences in metacognitive strategy use, task demand, and performance in integrated L2 speaking assessment tasks. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 876208. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.876208

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30