Adopting and Adapting AI for EFL Teaching in Indonesian Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46870/lets.v7i1.1800Keywords:
Ai Adoption, EFL Educators, AI Integrated-ELT, TAM, Higher EducationAbstract
Like a double-edged sword of technology, the swift development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in English Language Teaching (ELT) has generated both benefits and drawbacks. While AI offers efficiency, personalization, and diverse learning resources, its integration requires critical consideration of pedagogical, ethical, and contextual factors. This study investigates how EFL educators in Indonesian higher education perceive, adopt, and adapt AI tools in their teaching, focusing on acceptance, practical use, perceived risks, and training needs. This study applied a qualitative case study approach, in which five lecturers with previous experience in using AI for language teaching were interviewed through a semi-structured format. The collected data were examined using thematic analysis, guided by the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the framework of professional development theory. Findings reveal varied acceptance levels, such as some educators demonstrate a high adoption tendency, others adopt it selectively to align with pedagogical goals, and some engage in critical adoption with verification. Reported benefits include time savings in material preparation, enhanced engagement, and increased flexibility., Meanwhile, concerns involve content accuracy, over-reliance by students, reduced teacher–student interaction, and uneven digital infrastructure. Most participants expressed the need for targeted, practice-oriented training, particularly in designing AI-assisted learning media. The research highlights that institutional support, clear ethical frameworks, and continuous professional training are essential to guarantee that AI functions as a supportive tool rather than substituting teachers’ expertise. Beyond highlighting varied adoption tendencies and training needs, this study informs the development of professional development programs and ethical guidelines tailored to the realities of Indonesian higher education. While the study is limited to a small number of lecturers in a single context, it opens pathways for comparative and longitudinal research that can further enrich global understanding of AI integration in EFL education.
References
Adewusi, M. A. (2025). AI in universities: The good, the bot, and the ugly truths. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6883202/v1
Aghaziarati, A., Nejatifar, S., & Abedi, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence in education: Investigating teacher attitudes. Aitechbesosci, 1(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.aitech.1.1.6
Atmojo, A. E. P., & Nugroho, A. (2020). EFL classes must go online! Teaching activities and challenges during COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Register Journal, 13(1), 49–76. https://doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v13i1.49-76
Bachtiar, B. (2025). Preparing citizens for the future of digital literacy and AI. In Advances in educational technologies (pp. 405–440). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-9015-3.ch015
Benaicha, B., & Abdellatif, S. (2024). Investigating Algerian EFL teachers’ attitudes towards AI utilization in language education. A.J, 5(3), 130–150. https://doi.org/10.70091/atras/ai.8
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Çelik, İ., Dindar, M., Muukkonen, H., & Järvelä, S. (2022). The promises and challenges of artificial intelligence for teachers: A systematic review of research. TechTrends, 66(4), 616–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00715-y
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Dizon, G., & Gayed, J. M. (2024). A systematic review of Grammarly in L2 English writing contexts. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2397882. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2397882
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., & Ahuja, M. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Escalante, J., Pack, A., & Barrett, A. (2023). AI-generated feedback on writing: Insights into efficacy and ENL student preference. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00425-2
Göçen, A., & Aydemir, F. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education and schools. Research on Education and Media, 12(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.2478/rem-2020-0003
Gupta, P., Sreelatha, C., Latha, A. A., Raj, S., & Singh, A. (2024). Navigating the future of education: The impact of artificial intelligence on teacher–student dynamics. EATP, 6006–6013. https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i4.2332
Huynh, Q. Q. (2024). A literature review on EFL students’ integration of AI-based tools in English learning and the perceived impact on autonomy. IJAILE, 1(2), 30–51. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijaile.24123
Ithriyah, S., & Meilana, S. F. (2025). Implementation of English learning at Batu Ampar 02 East Jakarta elementary school with innovative artificial intelligence technology. Islamika, 7(1), 200–214. https://doi.org/10.36088/islamika.v7i1.5561
Jiang, R. (2022). How does artificial intelligence empower EFL teaching and learning nowadays? A review on artificial intelligence in the EFL context. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1049401. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1049401
Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., & Hüllermeier, E. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Muthmainnah, M., Al Yakin, A., Obaid, A. J., & Ziboon, A. R. T. (2024). Shaping user behavior in EFL education: An evaluation of artificial intelligence, computational thinking, and computational participation frameworks in digital humanities. AIP Conference Proceedings, 3207(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0234077
Nazaretsky, T., Ariely, M., Cukurova, M., & Alexandron, G. (2022). Teachers’ trust in AI-powered educational technology and a professional development program to improve it. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(4), 914–931.
Nugroho, A., & Mutiaraningrum, I. (2020). EFL teachers’ beliefs and practices about digital learning of English. Edulite: Journal of English Education, Literature, and Culture, 5(2), 304–321. https://doi.org/10.30659/e.5.2.304-321
Suharno, S., Musthafa, B., & Purnawarman, P. (2025). Exploring perceptions and experiences: Integrating AI in English language teaching from the perspectives of learners and educators. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 15(1), 499–515. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v15i1.pp499-515
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2021). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000386510
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Sage.
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education: Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Zou, D., Xie, H., & Kohnke, L. (2025). Navigating the future: Establishing a framework for educators’ pedagogic artificial intelligence competence. European Journal of Education, 60(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70117
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Uswatun Hasanah, Baso Jabu, Sultan Baa

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.









