A Comprehensive Program Evaluation of the Thesis Boot Camp Implementation: Impact on Thesis Writing Ability and Pedagogical Challenges in English Education at IAIN Palopo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46870/lets.v7i1.1602Keywords:
Academic Writing, Bootcamp, Higher Education, Student Challenges, Thesis WritingAbstract
Thesis writing is a major challenge for undergraduate students, often leading to delays in graduation. This study examines the impact of a Thesis Writing Boot Camp on students’ abilities and identifies the challenges faced by 33 students from the English Language Education Study Program at IAIN Palopo. Using a descriptive quantitative approach, data were collected via questionnaires from 23 respondents. Findings revealed that strongly positive outcomes: a high majority of participants reported satisfaction (73.9% satisfied/very satisfied), found materials relevant (82.6% relevant/highly relevant), and rated facilitators highly (91.3% good/excellent). The program also led to significant self-reported improvements in understanding thesis structure (73.9% improved/significantly improved) and increased writing confidence (65.2% confident/very confident). Mentoring sessions were deemed highly beneficial (82.6% beneficial/highly beneficial), and the program received a strong endorsement (60.9% highly likely to recommend). However, challenges persisted, including insufficient time allocation for some sessions (as noted by 8.7% of respondents), only moderate gains in confidence and understanding among a substantial subgroup (34.8%), and an uncomfortable learning environment for a minority (8.7%). The study concludes that structured, intensive Boot Camp is highly effective, and recommendations are provided for program enhancement, including extending session duration and improving the learning environment to optimize outcomes.
References
Ariyanti. (2016). Shaping students’ writing skills: The study of fundamental aspects in mastering academic writing. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 1(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.21462/ijefll.v1i1.5
Badri, R. E., Susanti, Pranyoto, E., Gunawan, A., & Rumangkit, S. (2022). Research bootcamp dalam meningkatkan kemampuan menulis artikel ilmiah. J-ABDI: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 2(3), 4407–4412. https://doi.org/10.53625/jabdi.v2i3.2989
Budjalemba, A. S., & Listyani, L. (2020). Factors contributing to students’ difficulties in academic writing class: Students’ perceptions. UC Journal: ELT, Linguistics and Literature Journal, 1(2), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.24071/uc.v1i2.2966
Cao, C., Li, Y., Zhao, L., & Li, Y. (2025). New inequality in equality: An empirical study on the effects of device and physical environment appropriateness divide on e-learning outcomes. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 219, 124256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124256
Cayley, R. (2020). Dissertation boot camps: Developing self-efficacy and building community. In Learning from the lived experiences of graduate student writers (pp. 198–217). Utah State University Press. https://doi.org/10.7330/9781607329589.c011
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.
Dunmoye, I. D., Martin, J. P., Brown, J. S., Lu, L. Z., Hunsu, N., & May, D. (2025). Examining the mediating role of learning presence in the predictive relationships between social and teaching presences and cognitive presence in collaborative virtual reality learning environments. Computers & Education: X Reality, 6, 100101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cexr.2025.100101
Fladd, N., Bermingham, C., & Stewart, N. W. (2019). Evaluating the effectiveness of dissertation boot camp delivery models. Writing Center Journal, 37(2). https://doi.org/10.7771/2832-9414.1881
Flowerdew, L., & Petrić, B. (2024). A critical review of corpus-based pedagogic perspectives on thesis writing: Specificity revisited. English for Specific Purposes, 76, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2024.05.003
Furwana, D., & Syam, A. T. (2019). Improving students’ writing skill on descriptive text by estafet strategy of the eleventh-year students of SMA 4 Palopo. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v7i1.722
Habibie, P. (2022). Writing for scholarly publication in an interconnected disjunctured world. Journal of Second Language Writing, 58, 100933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2022.100933
Hariyadi, S., Haris, A., Anto, F., & Sari, W. A. (2017). Identifikasi faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penyelesaian skripsi pada mahasiswa S1 Psikologi di Kota Semarang. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 34(2), 155–160.
Husnaini, & Yahya, A. (2023). Peningkatan kemampuan bahasa Inggris melalui Fun with English Pondok Pesantren Nurul Ummah-Morowali. Community Development Journal, 4(1), 533–537.
Karlsholm, G., Strand, L. B., André, B., & Grønning, K. (2024). Learning evidence-based practice by writing the bachelor’s thesis: A prospective cohort study in undergraduate nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 139, 106239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106239
Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (1964). Essentials of research design and methodology. John Wiley & Sons.
Lee, J., & Bonk, C. J. (2019). Integrating flipped learning with team-based learning in a pre-service teacher education course: Experiences and outcomes. International Journal on E-Learning, 18(1), 5–29.
Lestari, D. M. (2020). An analysis of students’ difficulties in writing undergraduate thesis at English education program of Muhammadiyah University of Bengkulu. Premise: Journal of English Education and Applied Linguistics, 9(1), 17–29.
Madehang. (2015). Teaching writing descriptive text through collaborative learning. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 1.
McCutcheon, S. (2024). Boot camps: A review of the pedagogy in construction education with an exploratory study on implementation in industry. Education Sciences, 5, 211–201. https://doi.org/10.29007/zjl5
Mendoza, L., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Lehtonen, T., & Hyytinen, H. (2023). Understanding master’s thesis writers in a Finnish EMI context: Writing conceptions, apprehension about grammar, self-efficacy for thesis writing, and thesis grade. International Journal of Educational Development, 103, 102874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2023.102874
Merga, M. K., Mason, S., & Morris, J. E. (2020). ‘What do I even call this?’ Challenges and possibilities of undertaking a thesis by publication. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(9), 1245–1261. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877x.2019.1671964
Navas, B. (2013). The language laboratory and the EFL course. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 6(1), 8–14.
Ngurah, G., Dananjaya, A., Rasmini, N. K., Sudana, P., & Ardiana, A. (2023). Determinants of accounting student readiness to face the world of work. JIA (Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi), 8(2), 528–539. https://doi.org/10.23887/jia.v8i2.65327
Nur Amalia, N., & Putera Jaya, H. (n.d.). Factors hindering the students in completing their undergraduate thesis: A study at an English education study program in Indonesia. IJLECR (International Journal of Language Education and Cultural Review). https://doi.org/10.21009/ijlecr.v9i2.37472
Pintz, C., & Posey, L. (2013). Preparing students for graduate study: An e-learning approach. Nurse Education Today, 33(7), 734–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2012.11.020
Puspita, C. (2019). Factors affecting students’ difficulties in writing thesis: A mixed-methods research at eighth semester of English study program in IAIN Curup. In Proceedings of the 3rd English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) (Vol. 3, pp. 13–22).
Ren, B., & Zhu, W. (2023). A Chinese EFL student’s strategies in graduation thesis writing: An activity theory perspective. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 61, 101202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101202
Rowtho, V., Gopee, S., & Hingun, A. (2020). Doctoral boot camps: From military concept to andragogy. Education and Training, 62(4), 379–392. https://doi.org/10.1108/et-11-2018-0233
Søndergaard Knudsen, H. B., Donau, P. S., & Archibald, L. (2025). Writing strategies and SRSD in a Danish context: A pilot study. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101395
Stritch, J. M. (2025). Enhancing academic writing confidence and productivity: The impact of TUS WEWRITE! Journal of Professional Nursing, 60, 32–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2025.06.007
Syam, A. T. (2020). Developing writing module for the fourth-semester learners of English department at State Islamic Institute of Palopo. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 17–28.
Taye, T., & Mengesha, M. (2024). Identifying and analyzing common English writing challenges among regular undergraduate students. Heliyon, 10(17), e36876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36876
Tokarz, R., Bucy, R., Medaille, A., & Beisler, M. (2022). The role of self-efficacy in the thesis-writing experiences of undergraduate honors students. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 10. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.10.2
Wahyu, Hasanah, U., Muhkam, M. A., & Purwati, D. (2025). Student attitudes toward AI-assisted thesis writing and critical reading: A case study from Indonesian English programs. LETS: Journal of Linguistics and English Teaching Studies, 6(2), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.46870/lets.v6i2.1462
West, R. E., Tateishi, I., Wright, G. A., & Fonoimoana, M. (2012). Innovation 101: Promoting undergraduate innovation through a two-day boot camp. Creativity Research Journal, 24(2–3), 243–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.677364
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Husnaini, Wahibah, Kalsum, Ermawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
