Student Attitudes Toward AI-Assisted Thesis Writing and Critical Reading: A Case Study from Indonesian English Programs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46870/lets.v6i2.1462Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Thesis Writing, English Education, Critical ThinkingAbstract
This study explores the role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in undergraduate thesis writing within English Language Education programs in Indonesia, particularly its influence on students' academic writing and critical reading. Using a qualitative case study approach, the research investigates how final-year students incorporate AI tools such as ChatGPT, Quillbot, and Claude AI throughout the thesis development process, including research, drafting, revision, and engagement with academic texts. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews involving twelve students who had experience using AI during their thesis work. Findings show that students perceive AI as a helpful tool for improving writing structure, grammar, and argumentation. Beyond writing support, AI was also seen as valuable for enhancing reading comprehension, especially in interpreting complex academic texts, clarifying unfamiliar concepts, and synthesizing multiple sources. However, they expressed concerns about the risk of over-reliance on AI, particularly when it replaces deep reading or independent thinking. These insights highlight both the benefits and limitations of AI in academic context. The study concludes that while AI tools can support academic literacy by enhancing both writing and reading practices, their effectiveness depends on how they are used. Thoughtful integration of AI in higher education should promote ethical awareness, reflective use, and the continued development of essential skills such as critical thinking, critical reading, and independent writing.
References
Al-Raimi, M., Mudhsh, B. A., Al-Yafaei, Y., & Al-Maashani, S. (2024). Utilizing artificial intelligence tools for improving writing skills: Exploring Omani EFL learners’ perspectives. Forum for Linguistic Studies (Transferred), 6(2), 1177.
Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2024). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(3), 460–474.
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2019). Teaching and researching reading (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Grubaugh, S., Levitt, G., & Deever, D. (2023). Harnessing AI to power constructivist learning: An evolution in educational methodologies. EIKI Journal of Effective Teaching Methods, 1(3).
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Ilma, A., & Sampurna, R. A. (2024). Exploring the impact of language models on undergraduate thesis writing skills among higher education students. Peradaban Journal of Interdisciplinary Educational Research, 2(1), 1–21.
Khan, M. S. (2023). A multidimensional approach towards addressing existing and emerging challenges in the use of ChatGPT. AI and Ethics, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-023-00386-1
Kong, H., Yin, Z., Chon, K., Yuan, Y., & Yu, J. (2024). How does artificial intelligence (AI) enhance hospitality employee innovation? The roles of exploration, AI trust, and proactive personality. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 33(3), 261–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2023.2241862
Luckin, R., & Holmes, W. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson Education.
Mohamed, S., Parvin, A., & Parra, E. (2024). Chatting with AI: Deciphering developer conversations with ChatGPT. In 2024 IEEE/ACM 21st International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR) (pp. 187–191). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1145/3627515.3655325
Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. John Wiley & Sons.
Shiri, A. (2024). Artificial intelligence literacy: A proposed faceted taxonomy. Digital Library Perspectives, 40(4), 681–699. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLP-11-2023-0051
Simms, R. C. (2024). Work with ChatGPT, not against: Three teaching strategies that harness the power of artificial intelligence. Nurse Educator, 49(3), 158–161. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001443
Tran, K. Q. (2024). The effects of integrating artificial intelligence into learning academic vocabulary among masters in English studies students. International Journal of AI in Language Education, 1(1), 1–19.
Williamson, B., & Eynon, R. (2020). Historical threads, missing links, and future directions in AI in education. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 223–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1798276
Wu, Q. (2024). Can Chinese L2 teachers identify AI-generated compositions? Evidence from narratives of Chinese L2 learners, native speakers, and ChatGPT-4. Editors, 90.
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Zhang, L. (2024). Exploring generative AI with ChatGPT for possible applications in information literacy instruction. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 36(1), 64–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/1941126X.2023.2294272
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Wahyu, Uswatun Hasanah, Muhammad Arifin Muhkam, Dewi Purwati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.