The Implementation of Writing Assessment in Learning in SMA Negeri 5 Enrekang

Authors

  • Muftihaturrahmah Burhamzah Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Alamsyah Alam Universitas Negeri Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46870/lets.v3i2.177

Keywords:

Assessment, Learning, Writing

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to (1) explain the implementation of writing assessment procedures by English teachers at SMA Negeri 5 Enrekang in helping students learn to write and (2) discuss the challenges experienced by English teachers at SMA Negeri 5 Enrekang in conducting the assessments. A qualitative descriptive design was adopted in this investigation. The English teacher at SMA Negeri 5 Enrekang is the focus of this study, and the goal is to obtain an honest assessment of the English instructor. The observation method, interview method, and documentation method were utilized to collect data. Observation and documentation were used to gather data on the implementation of the authentic assessment by the English teacher at SMA Negeri 5 Enrekang, as well as observation and interviews to get data on the impediments to the implementation of the authentic assessment. The findings of this study show that the English teacher's evaluation in writing learning at SMA Negeri 5 Enrekang employs a test-and-non-test (portfolio and performance) strategy. This indicates that the evaluation was done correctly. Despite the fact that the evaluation was carried out honestly, it is not ideal due to obstacles in its execution. English teacher has number of challenges while conducting authentic assessments, including: (1) time management issues, (2) non-conducive classroom circumstances, (3) inadequate facilities and equipment, and (4) a lack of understanding of the assessment system in place. Because accurate evaluation is so difficult, it requires a delicate balance of judgment between knowledge and experience.

References

Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2005). Manajemen Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

-------. (2013). Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 (Teori dan Penerapannya).Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Iskandar. (2009). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Gaung Persada (GP Press).

Kartono. (2009). Menulis Tanpa Rasa Takut Membaca Realitas dengan Kritis. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Kosasih. (2014). Strategi Belajar dan Pembelajaran (Implementasi Kurikulum 2013). Bandung: IKAPI.

Mulyasa. (2010). Implementasi Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (Kemandirian Guru dan Kepala Sekolah). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Nurchalis, N. F., leman, I., & Selle, A. (2018). Lecturers’ Consideration in Developing Language Tests. EDUVELOP, 2(1), 20-36. https://doi.org/10.31605/eduvelop.v2i1.79

Suandi, I Nengah. (2008). Buku AjarPenelitian Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia. Singaraja: Undiksha.

Sudaryono. (2012). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Sugiyono. (2007). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2007). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif,dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sukmadinata, Nana Syaodih. (2009). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Tarigan. (1981). Menulis Sebagai Suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa. Bandung: Angkasa.

Wiyanto, Asul. (2000). Seri Terampil Diskusi. Jakarta: Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia (Grasindo).

Uswatunnisa. (2020). An Analysis of English National Exam: Test of English Proficiency for Student. ELT Worldwide: Journal of English Language Teaching 7 (1), 63-69

Downloads

Published

2022-06-29