Direksi Hakim atau Kepatuhan Hukum: Analisis Dasar Pertimbangan Putusan Bebas dalam Perkara Korupsi di Pengadilan Tipikor Bengkulu
Judicial Discretion or Legal Compliance: A Basic Analysis of Considerations for Acquittals in Corruption Cases at the Bengkulu Corruption Court
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46870/jhki.v6i1.1541Keywords:
Acquittal, Corruption, Judge, Corruption Court, Criminal ActAbstract
This research seeks to examine the basis of judicial reasoning behind the acquittal of defendants in corruption cases at the Bengkulu Corruption Court. The research employs an empirical legal approach using interviews, observation, and literature review techniques. hese problems underscore a disparity between normative legal standards and actual judicial practices, thereby impacting the effectiveness of anti-corruption initiatives at the regional level. hese problems underscore a disparity between normative legal standards and actual judicial practices, thereby impacting the effectiveness of anti-corruption initiatives at the regional level.. The challenges identified include a lack of independent witnesses, incorrect application of legal articles, and administrative irregularities during court proceedings. These problems underscore a disparity between normative legal standards and actual judicial practices, thereby impacting the effectiveness of anti-corruption initiatives at the regional level. The study recommends improving inter-agency coordination among law enforcement bodies and enhancing judicial capacity in handling corruption cases.
References
Agustin, Risca. “PIDANA MAKSIMUM JUDGES CONSIDERATION IN THE FALLING OF IMPRISONMENT DECISIONS EXCEED THE MAXIMUM CRIMINAL PROVISIONS.” Reformasi Hukum, 2023, 282–311.
Amalia, Susi. “Analisis Dampak Korupsi Pada Masyarakat (Studi Kasus Korupsi Pembangunan Shelter Tsunami Di Kecamatan Labuan Kabupaten Pandeglang).” Epistemik: Indonesian Journal of Social and Political Science 3, no. 1 (2022): 54–76. https://doi.org/10.57266/epistemik.v3i1.77.
Aslam, Nibraska. “Pencegahan Korupsi Di Sektor BUMN Dalam Perspektif Pelayanan Publik Di Indonesia.” Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi 7, no. 2 (2022): 359–72. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v7i2.818.
Cholidah, Dadah. “Peran Hakim Dalam Memperkokoh Integritas Peradilan Sebagai Pemenuhan Kepercayaan PubIik.” SALAM: Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Syar-I 10, no. 2 (2023): 627–46. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v10i2.32134.
Djufri, Darmadi. “Proses Pemeriksaan Perkara Di Muka Persidangan Pada Dakwaan Tindak Pidana Dan Benda Sitaan Dalam Proses Peradilan.” Solusi 20, no. 1 (2022): 49–63. https://doi.org/10.36546/solusi.v20i1.527.
Durham, Cole. “Amicus Curiae.” Revista Latinoamericana de Derecho y Religión 1, no. NE (2022): 126–37. https://doi.org/10.7764/rldr.ne01.009.
Eugenia, Felicia, Carla Joycelyne Limanto, and Dave David Tedjokusumo. “Tantangan Praktis Dalam Proses Pembuktian Perkara Pidana : Kredibilitas Saksi Dan Validitas Bukti Elektronik” 5, no. September (2024): 492–503.
Gaol, S L. “Titik Singgung Hukum Pidana Dan Perdata Dalam Penjatuhan Putusan Lepas Dari Segala Tuntutan Hukum Dalam Tindak Pidana Penggelapan (Studi Putusan Nomor ….” UNES Law Review 6, no. 1 (2023): 4056–67. https://review-unes.com/index.php/law/article/view/2173%0Ahttps://review-unes.com/index.php/law/article/download/2173/1732.
Ichsanullah, Ichsanullah, and Faisal Santiago. “Aspects of Legal Certainty, Justice and Usability in the Decisions of Judges in Civil Courts,” 2022. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.30-10-2021.2315815.
Jainah, Ompu Zainab, and Muhammad Zulkarnain. “Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Dengan Sengaja Membuat Gelap Asal Usul Seseorang ( Studi Putusan Nomor 94 / Pid . B / 2021 / Pn . Kla ).” Kewarganegaraan 6, no. 2 (2022): 3131.
Lamada, Victoria Tabita Majesty, and Tetania Retno Gumilang. “The Function of Legal Research in Formulation of Legislation.” Jurnal Hukum Prasada 7, no. 1 (2020): 61–65. https://doi.org/10.22225/jhp.7.1.1373.61-65.
Marpaung, Raja Robert, Paulus Sinatra Wijaya, Leo Famli, Prof Ade Saptomo, and M Si. “International Journal of Social Science and Human Research Problems with the Reformulation of the Article on Insulting the President and Vice President in the Context of a Democratic State” 08, no. 01 (2025): 196–202. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v8-i1-21.
Musriadi, and Anggi Mayasari. “Kejati Bengkulu Tangkap Satu Tersangka Kasus Korupsi Dana BOK.” Antara News Bengkulu, 2023. https://bengkulu.antaranews.com/berita/307161/kejati-bengkulu-tangkap-satu-tersangka-kasus-korupsi-dana-bok.
Nada, Izzah Qotrun. “Kedudukan Lembaga Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (Kpk) Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia (Telaah Yuridis Normatif Putusan Mk).” Constitution Journal 1, no. 1 (2022): 61–78. https://doi.org/10.35719/constitution.v1i1.9.
Nurholidah, Nurholidah, Sahuri Lasmadi, and Yulia Monita. “Problematika Dalam Penyidikan Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law 2, no. 3 (2021): 12–24. https://doi.org/10.22437/pampas.v2i3.16325.
Orlando, A A. “Upaya Pembuktian Surat Dakwaan Berbentuk Alternatif Oleh Penuntut Umum Dalam Tindak Pidana Pengrusakan.” Verstek 7, no. 1 (2015): 25–31. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/verstek/article/view/30034.
Pakpahan, Raymon Dart, Herlina Manullang, and Roida Nababan. “Analisis Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Pidana Kepada Yang Membuka Lahan Dengan Cara Membakar (Studi Putusan Nomor 623/Pid.B/2019/PN.BTA).” PATIK: Jurnal Hukum 07, no. 2 (2019): 123–36. https://ejournal.uhn.ac.id/index.php/patik.
Permana, Sidik, and Mursyid Setiawan. “Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi Korupsi Sektor Pendidikan Di Indonesia : Realitas , Penyebab , Dan Solusi” 10, no. 2 (2024): 249–68.
Pratama, Nikolaus Adi, and Elza Qorina Pangestika. “Peran Aparat Penegak Hukum Dalam Mendukung Kebijakan Restorative Justice Di Indonesia” 5, no. 1 (2024): 545–54.
Rais, Muslihin. “Nilai Keadilan Putusan Hakim Pada Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Al Daulah : Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Ketatanegaraan 6, no. 1 (2017): 121–44. https://doi.org/10.24252/ad.v6i1.4870.
Ryana, Pricilia, and Aisy Idzati. “Corruption in the Study of Law and Human Rights.” Lex Scientia Law Review 2, no. 2 (2018): 177–88. https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v2i2.27583.
Sembiring, Tara Yuliandora, Syaifullah Yophie Ardiyanto, and Tengku Arif Hidayat. “Tinjauan Yuridis Urgensi Keberadaan Motif Dalam Memutus Perkara Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana” 4 (2024): 2222–35.
Sinaga, Eka Kristina, and July Esther. “Analysis of Judges ’ Considerations Regarding Divorce Lawsuits Caused by Domestic Disputes,” 2025.
Tempo. “Catatan ICW Soal Tren Vonis Korupsi 2023: Kerugian Negara Mencapai Rp 56 Triliun, Tapi Yang Kembali Hanya Rp 7,3 Triliun,” 2024. https://www.tempo.co/hukum/catatan-icw-soal-tren-vonis-korupsi-2023-kerugian-negara-mencapai-rp-56-triliun-tapi-yang-kembali-hanya-rp-7-3-triliun-85377.
Yulduz Kholikulovna, Kholmuratova. “‘CORRUPTION IS A DANGEROUS CRIME FOR SOCIETY’ EUROPEAN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AND MANAGEMENT STUDIES CORRUPTION IS A DANGEROUS CRIME FOR SOCIETY Samarkand Specialized School of Arts Teacher of the Native Language and Literatur,” 2022, 23–27. https://doi.org/10.55640/eijmrms-02-06-05.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 QISTHOSIA : Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Indonesia
